Shifting Scenes 🎬


A Deep Dive into Actors' Movie Genre Selections

Introduction

Film history experts widely believe that the career transformation of actors is not only a manifestation of their personal artistic pursuits but also reflects changes in the film industry as well as broader socio-cultural shifts. In the glittering world of show business, every actor is a witness to the changing times and the evolution of culture. However, when we examine this world from a macro perspective, the complex and intricate patterns and laws that are hidden behind it begin to surface. In our upcoming research, we aim to explore the stories behind these patterns. By thoroughly analyzing the long-term evolution of film genres and the transformations in actors’ career paths, we will reveal the dynamic laws hidden in the world of cinema.


How to define transformation?

In our in-depth exploration of cinema, we first meticulously sorted through a vast amount of movie data. After delving into the information on IMDb, we identified 16 captivating movie theme types. These types represent not only the diversity of film art but also the developmental trajectory of the film industry.

Building on this foundation, we realized that to truly understand an actor’s artistic transformation, mere genre labels are insufficient. We needed a method that could capture the flow of time and the changes in movie themes. Hence, we designed a unique sliding time window methodology. This method allows us to precisely capture the transitions of actors between different film genres over time.

Using this method, we were able to assign a unique label to each phase of an actor’s career, which we call “PeriodTag.” This tag not only marks a certain time point but also represents the main movie genres the actor was involved in during that period. It acts like a compass, guiding us to understand how actors navigate between different types of films.

Now, with this powerful analytical tool in hand, let’s uncover the secrets of each actor’s artistic career, explore their transformation journey, and appreciate the brilliance of their art that evolves with time.

To validate our analysis, we selected a typical example: Tony Stark! Oops, we mean Robert Downey Jr.

In the graph, we captured the movies he was involved in between the ages of 30 and 45, a key period of transformation. Robert Downey Jr. initially starred in a variety of movie genres, particularly comedies. However, after becoming the Iron Man we all know, he started focusing more on adventure-type films. This aligns with our perception of him, demonstrating that our PeriodTag effectively captures significant transformations in an actor’s career.

After this journey-like exploration and analysis, we now stand at a new starting point. We are not just observers of film history but explorers deciphering the career paths of actors. Through meticulous work, we have successfully charted timelines for each actor’s career and marked the movie theme types for each stage on these timelines.

The periods and their transitions are the core focus of our research. We have not only recorded the passage of time but also captured the moments of artistic transformation in actors. We can easily observe the duration of each period, as well as the total number of career transitions each actor has undergone.

Now, let us embark on this exciting exploration. We will initially explore the duration of different movie genres in actors’ careers. This is not merely a presentation of data; it is an in-depth interpretation of actors’ career trajectories and a delicate tribute. Together, let’s uncover the stories behind these numbers and experience each artistic transformation and the breath of the eras.


Let us tell you a little story about data

First, we will begin our investigation into the duration of film genres in actors’ careers.

This chart’s long-tail distribution reveals the enduring relationship between actors and film genres. It indicates that while a minority of actors may focus on a specific type of film for a long period, becoming iconic figures in that genre, the majority of actors, like explorers, continuously seek change and new directions. This adaptability is in response to the ongoing evolution of artistic trends and audience preferences.

Faced with this familiar long-tail distribution, let’s turn our attention to these logarithmically transformed box plots, which reveal the distribution of durations for which actors consistently appear in a particular film genre.

We can observe that the duration for which most film genres are continuously acted in shows a tendency towards concentration. This leads us to seek insight: Is there an inherent difference in actors’ love for various film genres?

To delve deeper into whether there is a significant difference in the duration of actors’ preference for different film genres, we removed outliers from the data and performed a logarithmic transformation.

Guided by this chart, we uncovered a striking clue: there is a significant difference in the duration of most film genres. Notably, comedy stands out, with a duration higher than most other genres, occupying a prominent position in the annals of film history. Although the sample size for detective films is smaller and their confidence interval relatively wider, this does not obscure the fact that the duration of detective films tends to be shorter than other genres.

Transfer patterns between genres

In exploring the career transitions of actors, the genre transition map has become our compass. Through the heatmap processed with row normalization, we are able to gain insights into the likelihood of transitions from one movie genre to another.

A notable trend is that the path towards action movies is relatively rare, which may reflect the high skill and physical demands of action films on actors. In contrast, transitions among other movie genres largely conform to industry expectations, showing a coherent and smooth transition. For instance, actors in Westerns often choose to move into crime or adventure films, while those in adventure and honor films tend to gravitate towards thrillers.

However, the most striking trend is the tendency of actors who have made their mark in comedy to transition towards thriller genres. This finding upends our traditional notions.

To further explore the intricate world of an actor’s career evolution, we will examine three significant themes. These themes serve as guiding lights, unveiling the subtle interplay between individual and broader aspects, personal experiences and historical contexts, and the varied forces that shape actors as they navigate through the ever-changing realm of their profession.

Theme I: Stamp of the times

As the wheels of history continue to turn, the world of cinema evolves within the currents of time. Each transition marks a new chapter, and every scene bears the imprint of its era. On this ever-evolving stage, we peer through the lens of macroscopic data to explore how the forces of time shape the landscape of the film industry and influence the careers of those who stand in the spotlight.

Our exploration begins with a question: How significant is the impact of changing eras on the film industry and the career choices of actors? Delving deep into the layers of history, we depict the distribution of genres across different periods and trace the trajectories of actors’ career shifts through charts and graphs. We strive to decipher the language of the times, seeking to understand how it guides the entertainment world towards new heights amidst continual change.

Distribution of Movie Theme Types under Different Generations

As the history of cinema unfolds, each era leaves its unique imprint on the silver screen, reflecting the shifts in social culture and the evolution of public aesthetics. Our data analysis has revealed several key trends:

  • 1940s: War and its Reflection on the Silver Screen

    In the 1940s, as the world was engulfed in the turmoil of war, there was a significant increase in war-themed movies. This not only reflected the social realities of the time but also demonstrated how cinema, as an art form, responded to the backdrop of the era. The popularity of war films, such as the love and sacrifice depicted in “Casablanca,” allowed audiences in dark theaters to experience the direct and indirect impacts of war.

  • 1950s: The Prevalence of Adventure Genres

    Entering the 1950s, with television becoming a household staple, the film industry faced new competition. To attract audiences back to cinemas, adventure-type movies like “Ben-Hur” and “The Ten Commandments” peaked. These films, with their grand scenes and rich visual effects, successfully drew viewers from the small screens at home to the big screens in movie theaters.

  • 1980s: The Rise of Action Films

    By the 1980s, with the development of new technologies and the rise of individual heroism, action movies became mainstream. New special effects technologies, such as Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI), enabled action films like “The Terminator” and “Star Wars” to offer unprecedented visual experiences. These movies were not just mere entertainment; they also reflected the societal pursuit of heroism and technological advancement of the time.

  • Continual Love and Humor

    In engaging with our data, you will notice that detective, western, and musical films have gradually become less popular, while the fantasy and thriller genres generally show an upward trend. However, amidst all these changes, romance and comedy films have consistently maintained their position. Regardless of the shifts in time, people’s need for love and humor remains constant, making these genres, such as “When Harry Met Sally,” steadfast pillars in the movie market.

Overall, our data analysis reveals that the popularity trends of movie genres not only reflect the interests and aesthetics of the audience but also respond to the dynamic changes in social and cultural trends. From war to adventure, from heroism to love, each era’s films are a direct reflection and profound contemplation of that time.

The overall effect of particular chronological contexts on the rate of genre shift of actors appearing in movies

Furthermore, as we delve deeper into the historical context, we can discover that actors’ choices in movie genres are closely linked to the socio-cultural background of their respective eras.

From the chart, we can observe that the rate of change in film genres was significantly higher in the 1950s and 1980s compared to the vast majority of other decades.

In the 1950s, the post-war society was filled with optimism, driving the flourishing and innovation within the film industry. Meanwhile, in the 1980s, emerging technologies like CGI attracted audiences, injecting new life into the world of cinema.

Through these two dynamic eras, we can discern that the increased rate of change in film genres was not an isolated occurrence. It was profoundly influenced by the historical context, societal mindset, and technological revolution. These peaks in genre transitions, akin to labels of their respective times, signify significant leaps in human culture and technological progress within the history of cinema.

Theme II: Individual and Collective

The ever-changing cultural and technological environment forms an immutable backdrop for actors, which to some extent restricts or propels the evolution of their genre choices. However, our focus is not solely on these overall trends within the macro context of the era; we also aim to explore the specific impact of individual factors on the transformations in actors’ genre choices.

  1. Age

    In the world of the silver screen, different ages present different styles. We first reveals the distribution of movie genres across age distributions

    In the genre of ‘action’ movies, actors aged 45 to 60 are the backbone. Actors in this age group bring their mature charm and steadfast presence, demonstrating the strength and depth required in action films. In romantic films, a completely different age spectrum is presented before us. Among these, young actors aged 15 to 30 become the main narrators of love stories. When fantasy becomes the theme of the film, we see extremes at both ends: the dreams of childhood and the wisdom of old age intertwined. In fantasy films, the innocence of children and the weathered wisdom of the elderly together create the unique magic of this genre.

    What is the relationship between an actor’s age and their frequency of transitioning roles?

    To answer this, we have drawn the following line graph. We defined the concept of ‘transition ratio’ to indicate the frequency of role transitions in a certain age group.

    As we can see, within the 20 to 30 age group, the rate of change in movie genres for actors is significantly higher than in all other age groups. We believe this reflects their exploratory spirit in the early stages of their career and the industry’s diverse role opportunities for newcomers. At this stage, young actors, driven by curiosity for the unknown and a desire for possibilities, immerse themselves in a variety of film roles.

    Furthermore, we have drawn transition rate curves after grouping by gender and age as follows:

    From the graph, we can see that in the 20-30 age group, the rate of role transition is higher for female actors than for male actors, suggesting that female actors in this age group are more diverse and open in their role choices. This could be because the industry offers a wider range of roles to young women, or because young female actors are more willing to explore different career opportunities. Apart from the specific age group mentioned, there is no significant difference in the transition rates between males and females in other age groups, indicating that gender may not be a major factor affecting actors’ opportunities for role transition throughout most of their careers.
    The above analysis provides insights into the impact of gender and age on the role transition rates of actors in the film industry and may indicate that the opportunities offered to actors at different career stages in the film industry are unequal. Moreover, these results may also reflect how societal and cultural expectations for different genders and age groups shape career paths in the film industry.

  2. Height

    Does an actor’s height also limit the number of times they can transition roles? Out of curiosity, we grouped actors by height to explore the distribution of film genres among actors of different height ranges. Due to the different height distributions among different genders, we have decided to analyze the distribution by gender groups.

    Looking at the overall distribution of genres, we believe that for extremely tall male and female actors, there is a strong limitation in the choice of film themes, and the overall sample size is small, making the study less significant. We instead focused on the differences in distribution across each genre. We found that on the silver screen, height is not just a game of numbers; it plays a specific role in the choice of film themes.

    For female actors, height is like a key to their role choices. In ‘action’ and ‘sci-fi’ films, female actors around 1.70 meters tall seem to be more favored. Their tall stature complements the image of strong female characters in movies.
    When the plot shifts to ‘romance’, ‘musicals’, ‘westerns’, or ‘war movies’, female actors between 1.60 and 1.65 meters seem to find a better fit. Women of this height range blend more naturally into the story settings of sweet love stories, joyous musical scenes, dusty western towns, or smoke-filled battlefields.

    And when we delve further into comparing the frequency of role transformations between male and female actors across different height groups, we find that male actors seem to have a broader stage. Even if a male actor is of similar height to a female actor, he appears to be able to navigate through more roles. This is not just the magic of height, but perhaps also a manifestation of gender dynamics within the industry. This market preference paints a picture where male actors can freely explore, while female actors may be confined within a narrower frame of the lens.

Theme III: Awards and Success

In the glittering world of cinema, there’s a pinnacle of recognition that affirms an actor’s career - the laurel of international awards. In this section, we delve into the stories of 788 actors who have left their mark at the Oscars and the three major international film festivals.

What drives an actor, who once delivered a heartfelt performance in a drama, to shift to the adrenaline-pumping scenes of action movies after winning an award? And what force compels a comedy star, after basking in applause and accolades, to choose to showcase a different facet of their talent in a suspenseful thriller?

In the transformations of these award-winners, we might glimpse the boundless possibilities of cinematic art, and the continually evolving artistic soul of actors under the spotlight.

To understand the patterns of genre transitions before and after winning awards, we created a Sankey diagram of the film genres of award winners, both before and after their victories. This not only shows the transitions between genres but also maps out the artistic journeys of the actors. Frequent switches between drama, romance, and comedy are like actors dancing gracefully in the world of theater, showcasing their acting skills through these dynamic movements. Simultaneously, there are astonishing leaps, such as from comedy to horror, akin to actors suddenly changing their dance steps on stage, astonishing the audience with their versatility and willingness to experiment.

As an actor, the moment you receive an international award undoubtedly marks the most important milestone in your career. For many actors, it is not just a symbol of honor but also a significant leap in their professional journey.

The majority of these award-winning actors are in their golden age, between 20 to 40 years old. However, the stars do not age with time, and some shine brightly even if late. There are actors who have won their first major award in their 80s, reminding us that the starlight never ages, and dreams never fade.

On the stage of award-winning glory, we witness perseverance and miracles. Most actors might experience their moment of honor within the first five career transitions. Yet, there are others who undergo nearly 30 transformations along their lengthy career path, enduring twists and turns and long waits, before finally shining on the stage of the Oscars. Christopher Plummer is one such actor, who, with unparalleled perseverance and talent, became the oldest winner of the Best Supporting Actor award in Oscar history.

Christopher Plummer

From the above analysis, we have gained an understanding of what kind of group the award-winning actors are. Next, let’s focus further on the content, grouping by the genre of the award-winning movies, to see if the actors who won awards for various genres change their choice of genres after winning, and what exactly are those changes?

When actors receive honors in action or thriller films, it seems to pave a red-carpeted path for them to continue exploring within these genres. Data shows that the sequels of these award-winning actors often reap greater box office success, providing them with both recognition and considerable financial returns. This pattern of fame and fortune might be a key driver for actors to continue on this path.

However, the story appears different for drama and romance films. Winning awards in these categories doesn’t seem to increase the proportion of actors appearing in similar genre films. Why is this the case? Could there be more significant external factors influencing the actors’ choices? Thus, we considered two important factors affecting actors’ decisions apart from winning awards: film ratings and box office revenue.

We first analyzed film ratings. We scraped rating data for award-winning movies from IMDb, then calculated and compared the average ratings of movies in the same genre and different genres that actors participated in after winning awards. We also plotted the corresponding confidence intervals.

Through our research, we found no significant difference in the ratings of “Thriller” and “Romance” movies. Therefore, we shifted our focus to box office performance and found the answer to our question.

We compared the average box office revenues of movies in which actors continued to act in the same genre after winning an award versus those where they switched to different genres. To make our study more scientific, we accounted for the effect of inflation over different eras on box office earnings.

It is evident that after winning awards, action and thriller movies of the same genre tend to have significantly higher box office earnings compared to movies of other genres. In contrast, after winning awards for romance and drama, the situation reverses; the box office revenues of movies in other genres that these actors participate in surpass those when they continue to work in drama or romance films. This finding suggests that although winning an award may enhance an actor’s market value, they might prefer to leverage this value into opportunities to try new roles in other genres, especially when these roles promise higher economic returns.

This choice reflects the actors’ delicate decision-making in balancing artistic pursuits with economic benefits throughout their careers. It also reveals the complexity of the film market, where the relationship between an actor’s fame and box office success is not always linear. After winning awards, the choices facing actors are more complex than simply continuing in the same vein or transforming; their decisions are shaped by expectations, personal goals, and market potential.


Conclusion

In our extensive study of actors’ career choices, we explored the patterns of actors’ transitions between movie genres, the influence of historical context, personal factors such as age, gender, height, and the complex connections between awards, ratings, income, and genre selection. These analyses and conclusions provide us with a detailed picture of the internal workings of the film industry, revealing how actors balance their personal artistic vision, market opportunities, and societal cultural expectations. They remind us that while success in the film industry often means fame and fortune, actors’ choices are also influenced by both their personal career strategies and market forces. This insight helps us better understand the operations of the film industry and offers deeper insights for actors, producers, and audiences alike.

Ultimately, these studies highlight the importance of providing a more diverse range of opportunities for actors and the value of pushing the film industry towards a more inclusive and varied direction. These findings can offer valuable information for industry decision-makers, helping them to formulate strategies that support the diverse development of actors, while also providing audiences with richer and more profound cinematic experiences.

The end